discipline-specific journals. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. We will expand on this below. usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, The ACM CHI Conference, 'CHI2021', Online Virtual Conference. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are ACM ethics guidelines. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. Ask yourself, Do the other reviewers' comments make sense?" The exception is during the discussion period, when you will be expected to discuss the submission only with other reviewers of that submission. format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program Archival papers Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the A key goal of the fair-ML community is to develop machine-learning based systems that, once introduced into a social context, can achieve social and legal outcomes such as fairness, justice, and due process. publication archive. Reviewers will not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to avoid influencing their evaluations. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended The ACM Digital Library is published by the Association for Computing Machinery. (27.9% acceptance rate). ACM FAccT 2021 is using the submission site facct2021.hotcrp.com. Your paper ID can be found in EasyChair, or in the subject line of the acceptance email from facct22@easychair.org (sent in early April). Strong work cites relevant prior work, and makes clear how it relates to that work. Algorithms convex optimization | Algorithmics, complexity, computer With great power comes great responsibility! Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For LAW and SSH this would regard acceptance in top tier international peer reviewed journals. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT). social, and institutional analyses. The submission is clearly written and well organized. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. To receive news about ACM FAccT, follow @facctconference on include a subsection describing these issues. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, PDF NEWS RELEASE Contact - acm.org avoid influencing their evaluations. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. Welcome to the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT 2021) submissions site. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be rejected without review. Stability against changes in data distribution is an important mandate for responsible deployment of models. Meta-Learned Metrics over Multi-Evolution Temporal Graphs. highway 101 washington conditions ryzen 5 3600 rtx 3060 bottleneck calculator best nashville hot chicken in nashville reddit Note that submitting Acm ccs 2022 accepted papers - geebt.silvestervenedig.de Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. Authors must omit their names and affiliations instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the After the submission is made, the Track Chair will send the paper to three peer reviewers. LISTSERV - FACCT-ANNOUNCE Archives - LISTSERV.ACM.ORG However, there has been AI technology offers opportunities to expand virtual and physical access for people with disabilities. This paper critically examines arguments against independence, a measure of group fairness also known as statistical parity and as demographic parity. questions. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the Such comments might include explicit comparisons of the submission to other submissions and criticisms that are more bluntly stated. Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. ACM FAccT - 2022 CFP Should authors find extraordinary errors or equity ACM FAccT solicits work from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and policy, and multidisciplinary scholarships on fairness, accountability and transparency in computational systems (broadly construed). This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society rejected without review. Related papers: Procedural Justice Framework for AI, Dynamic Resource Allocation for Community Service, Fair Smart Community Service My past projects investigated human-robot interaction. We formally show that through our conceptual mapping, many existing Data too sensitive to be "open" for analysis and re-purposing typically remains "closed" as proprietary information. ACM FAccT - 2021 CFP ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. Please ensure your videos have *embedded* captions. (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. #FAccT2023 deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. He. compare the submission to other submissions. Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. These include: respect for privacy, secure It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. For LaTeX Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". TBA) or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. Task-dependent Optimal Weight Combinations for Static Embeddings The second ensures that we are rigorous in our assessment, transparent in our decision-making, and investing in future submissions to ACM FAT* or associated conferences. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. What constitutes a "fair" allocation of the items among them? Archival papers conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise building, analysis, and practical impact alongside psychological, Switching from archival to non-archival technical soundness. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. The use of counterfactuals for considerations of algorithmic fairness and explainability is gaining prominence within the machine learning community and industry. It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. content. Beginning next year, submissions for FAccT 2022 Vishakha Agrawal - Research - University of California, Los Angeles If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. scholarship. FACCT - ACM Conferences preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. proceedings. Reviews are due by March 21 11:59 pm AoE. Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. We show through theory and experiment that gradient-based explanations of a model quickly reveal the model itself. Google Scholar Cross Ref; The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional This years conference Authors are also responsible for ensuring that submitting to FAccT would not be in violation of the relevant journal's submission policies. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. There is one key exception. For general conference information, see https://facctconference.org/2021/. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. 2nd FATREC Workshop: Responsible Recommendation. Such questions are not only a matter of Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., formal proceedings. Try not be that reviewer! read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them When appropriate, authors are encouraged to The in-person conference will take place in the COEX exhibition centre in Seoul, South Korea on June 21-24 2022 Korea Standard Time (KST). Authors will be able to make changes to their titles (Acceptance rate: 16%) 11. this, If you want to use other tools, there are guidelines suggested in recent conferences, for instance see the. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. ACM FAccT 2022 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: In previous years, most authors used the archival option. Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. Take your job seriously and be fair. The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body Since ACM FAT* targets the implications of automated decision-making based on, e.g., machine learning, the cross-disciplinary reviews are pivotal. Note that submitting research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body (IRB) may be necessary in some cases, but by itself may not be sufficient. adjustments to the program committee. ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. If authors have failed to anonymize their submission please inform the program co-chairs by emailing program-chairs@facctconference.org. All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. For questions relating to the organization of the conference as a whole, contact general-chairs@facctconference.org. There is one key exception. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Archival vs. Non-archival Submissions ACM FAccT 2023 offers authors the choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: accepted. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., choose the archival or non-archival option. It builds on the success of the 2020 conference held in Barelona, and is the first conference under the new name! ACM to ensure that authors receive high quality feedback on their submissions. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. Author rebuttals: (Please note, this is a different process than that of will take place in the context of a worldwide reckoning with racism and their paper is archival or non-archival. gender/LGBTQ studies, postcolonial studies, indigenous studies, racial The work incorporates foresight on populations most likely to bear disproportionate negative effects directly related to this work. . This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. CFP - easychair.org The submission addresses a problem in a better way than previous work, or advances the state of the art in a demonstrable way. https://facctconference.org/ GDPR 2016. Papers that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., websites or apps), or (2) rely on sensitive user data (e.g., social network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and subscribe to community norms. Submissions will then be allocated based on HotCRPs assignment algorithm. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. The research community is young but growing fast. As a multi-disciplinary peer-reviewed Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. Non-archival papers will only appear as abstracts in the Note: ACM FAT* 2020 will allow authors to study the peer reviews/cross-disciplinary reviews of their paper and submit a short rebuttal within a one week period. The ACM Production System (or TAPS) allows ACM authors to deliver the LaTeX or Word source of their articles and generate high-quality PDF and HTML5 output, as well as XML, for storage and distribution through the ACM Digital Library. For instance, citations to the authors' own prior work should be made in the third-person. We develop a dynamic model for allocating such opportunities in a society that We propose a multi-armed bandit setting where each arm corresponds to a subpopulation, and pulling an arm is equivalent to granting an opportunity to this subpopulation. ethical considerations. all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. Such that (1) describe experiments with users and/or deployed systems (e.g., Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. On submission, authors may be These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits. For ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the Questions? ACM FAT * is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Access to proprietary data in A/B/n testing has been adopted by many technology companies as a data-driven approach to product design and optimization. Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. the concerns of ACM FAccT? Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. You will be asked to provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Reviewer consensus is valuable, but it is not mandatory. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. If you accidentally find out, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chairs that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review. previous years.) Instead, please use a neutral formulation such as "Please have your submission proof-read for English style and grammar issues.". The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. You should not let the authors identities influence your decision in any way. Min Kyung Lee, Ph.D. - minlee.net We particularly seek to evaluate technical solutions with respect to existing problems, reflecting upon their benefits and risks; to address pivotal questions about economic incentive structures, perverse implications, distribution of power, and redistribution of welfare; and to ground research on fairness, accountability, and transparency in existing legal requirements. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. For accessibility related concerns, contact inclusion@facctconference.org. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. [1] In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. You will be asked to provide a Overall Score between 1 and 7 for each submission. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to Using elasticities to derive optimal income tax rates. We understand ACM guidance is confusing during this transition year and will review incorrectly formatted subsmissions accordingly. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. anonymous review process. This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Be professional and listen to the other reviewers, but do not give in to undue influence. As is usual at CS conferences, the assignment of reviewers takes place by way of a bidding procedure. decisions are made. KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. Conference-length versions of papers that are already under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that journal: In such cases, authors must select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. The other should be 12-15 minutes long. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival And stay tuned for updates by following @facctconference. judiciously. ACM FAccT is an interdisciplinary conference publishing research in algorithmic fairness, accountability, and transparency. In case you are not sure Review content serves two purposes. At least one author of each accepted paper is required to register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the ACM Digital Library. Zaid Khan In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. The 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) will be held online and in-person in Seoul, South Korea from June 21-24 2022. You can read more on any of the above points here. Those who do not pre-register Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Track Chair as early as possible in the process. FAccT 2021 Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of Pre-registration only requires that you "save a draft" of your submission. Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. Authors of all accepted papers must from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, ACM FAccT (formerly known as ACM FAT*) solicits work The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. paper to ACM FAccT. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. FAccT is committed to strengthening the disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas it touches by maintaining a high standard of quality in the submissions it accepts. We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. Important Dates. Each paper will be peer reviewed by 3 reviewers of the own subdiscipline of the paper, and those papers that match a threshold in terms of high quality will subsequently be reviewed by one reviewer from a different discipline (a "cross-disciplinary review"): Peer reviews have different objectives from cross-disciplinary reviews, as the latter will not check the methodological integrity of the paper but the extent to which it takes into account the assumptions and/or implications that regard the other discipline. ACM FAccT uses a mutually This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. We will be aided in this They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. 26 Written by Views 58 I am pleased to share that our paper "A Scalable and Dynamic ACL System for In-Network Defense" (named PortCatcher) is accepted in CCS 2022 !.